I'm sorry, forwarding as plaintext.
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 10:45 AM MTK <kim1158@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Thank you Mr. Slava and Adam for introducing our research.
>
> If I was given an opportunity, I would like to share and discuss
> - A case of memory tiering solution for CXL memory, Samsung SMDK, which works across userspace and kernelspace : why and how
> - Some lessens learned from Industry while CXL integration
> - Proposal for possible Linux MM expansions for CXL memory
>
> Regarding FM topic, I'm also interested in what we should supports for CXL 3.0 and later topology.
>
> All the best
> Kyungsan
>
> 2023년 1월 27일 (금) 오전 4:05, Viacheslav A.Dubeyko <viacheslav.dubeyko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>님이 작성:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jan 26, 2023, at 8:58 AM, Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:30:34AM -0800, Viacheslav A.Dubeyko wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> On Jan 23, 2023, at 9:46 AM, Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 09:51:19PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
>> >>>> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023, Viacheslav A.Dubeyko wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> CC: LSF/MM/BPF mailing list. Sorry, missed the list.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Jan 6, 2023, at 11:51 AM, Viacheslav A.Dubeyko <viacheslav.dubeyko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Hello,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I believe CXL memory is hot topic now. I believe we have multiple topics
>> >>>>>> for discussion. I personally would like to discuss CXL Fabric Manager
>> >>>>>> and vision of FM architecture implementation. I am going to share the topic
>> >>>>>> in separate email. I would like to suggest a special session for CXL memory
>> >>>>>> related topics.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> How everybody feels about it?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I think this makes a lot of sense, thanks for suggesting it.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Should this be a BoF or just a normal topic proposal? I assume that there
>> >>>> could be several different topics of interest all related to CXL.mem.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> +1 for a normal topic proposal.
>> >>
>> >> By the way, Samsung SMDK (memory development kit) suggested memory model
>> >> in user-space and kernel memory subsystem modification. I assume that we need
>> >> to discuss the memory model and kernel-space modification. So, it could be one of
>> >> the CXL related topic. Could we expect that Samsung guys deliver a talk?
>> >
>> > +Kyungsan Kim
>> >
>> > It is my understanding that Kyungsan, who is the lead for the SMDK project is
>> > interested in sharing with the community some lessons learned from working with
>> > CXL attached memory and a CFP is planned.
>> >
>>
>> Sounds pretty great for me. :)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Slava.
>>
--
------------------------------------------------------------
the person who practices a truth goes toward light.
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 10:45 AM MTK <kim1158@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Thank you Mr. Slava and Adam for introducing our research.
>
> If I was given an opportunity, I would like to share and discuss
> - A case of memory tiering solution for CXL memory, Samsung SMDK, which works across userspace and kernelspace : why and how
> - Some lessens learned from Industry while CXL integration
> - Proposal for possible Linux MM expansions for CXL memory
>
> Regarding FM topic, I'm also interested in what we should supports for CXL 3.0 and later topology.
>
> All the best
> Kyungsan
>
> 2023년 1월 27일 (금) 오전 4:05, Viacheslav A.Dubeyko <viacheslav.dubeyko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>님이 작성:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jan 26, 2023, at 8:58 AM, Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:30:34AM -0800, Viacheslav A.Dubeyko wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> On Jan 23, 2023, at 9:46 AM, Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 09:51:19PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
>> >>>> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023, Viacheslav A.Dubeyko wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> CC: LSF/MM/BPF mailing list. Sorry, missed the list.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Jan 6, 2023, at 11:51 AM, Viacheslav A.Dubeyko <viacheslav.dubeyko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Hello,
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> I believe CXL memory is hot topic now. I believe we have multiple topics
>> >>>>>> for discussion. I personally would like to discuss CXL Fabric Manager
>> >>>>>> and vision of FM architecture implementation. I am going to share the topic
>> >>>>>> in separate email. I would like to suggest a special session for CXL memory
>> >>>>>> related topics.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> How everybody feels about it?
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I think this makes a lot of sense, thanks for suggesting it.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Should this be a BoF or just a normal topic proposal? I assume that there
>> >>>> could be several different topics of interest all related to CXL.mem.
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> +1 for a normal topic proposal.
>> >>
>> >> By the way, Samsung SMDK (memory development kit) suggested memory model
>> >> in user-space and kernel memory subsystem modification. I assume that we need
>> >> to discuss the memory model and kernel-space modification. So, it could be one of
>> >> the CXL related topic. Could we expect that Samsung guys deliver a talk?
>> >
>> > +Kyungsan Kim
>> >
>> > It is my understanding that Kyungsan, who is the lead for the SMDK project is
>> > interested in sharing with the community some lessons learned from working with
>> > CXL attached memory and a CFP is planned.
>> >
>>
>> Sounds pretty great for me. :)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Slava.
>>
--
------------------------------------------------------------
the person who practices a truth goes toward light.
