> On Jan 26, 2023, at 8:58 AM, Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:30:34AM -0800, Viacheslav A.Dubeyko wrote: >> >> >>> On Jan 23, 2023, at 9:46 AM, Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 09:51:19PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: >>>> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023, Viacheslav A.Dubeyko wrote: >>>> >>>>> CC: LSF/MM/BPF mailing list. Sorry, missed the list. >>>>> >>>>>> On Jan 6, 2023, at 11:51 AM, Viacheslav A.Dubeyko <viacheslav.dubeyko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> I believe CXL memory is hot topic now. I believe we have multiple topics >>>>>> for discussion. I personally would like to discuss CXL Fabric Manager >>>>>> and vision of FM architecture implementation. I am going to share the topic >>>>>> in separate email. I would like to suggest a special session for CXL memory >>>>>> related topics. >>>>>> >>>>>> How everybody feels about it? >>>>>> >>>> >>>> I think this makes a lot of sense, thanks for suggesting it. >>>> >>>> Should this be a BoF or just a normal topic proposal? I assume that there >>>> could be several different topics of interest all related to CXL.mem. >>>> >>> >>> +1 for a normal topic proposal. >> >> By the way, Samsung SMDK (memory development kit) suggested memory model >> in user-space and kernel memory subsystem modification. I assume that we need >> to discuss the memory model and kernel-space modification. So, it could be one of >> the CXL related topic. Could we expect that Samsung guys deliver a talk? > > +Kyungsan Kim > > It is my understanding that Kyungsan, who is the lead for the SMDK project is > interested in sharing with the community some lessons learned from working with > CXL attached memory and a CFP is planned. > Sounds pretty great for me. :) Thanks, Slava.
