On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:30:34AM -0800, Viacheslav A.Dubeyko wrote: > > > > On Jan 23, 2023, at 9:46 AM, Adam Manzanares <a.manzanares@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 09:51:19PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > >> On Fri, 6 Jan 2023, Viacheslav A.Dubeyko wrote: > >> > >>> CC: LSF/MM/BPF mailing list. Sorry, missed the list. > >>> > >>>> On Jan 6, 2023, at 11:51 AM, Viacheslav A.Dubeyko <viacheslav.dubeyko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hello, > >>>> > >>>> I believe CXL memory is hot topic now. I believe we have multiple topics > >>>> for discussion. I personally would like to discuss CXL Fabric Manager > >>>> and vision of FM architecture implementation. I am going to share the topic > >>>> in separate email. I would like to suggest a special session for CXL memory > >>>> related topics. > >>>> > >>>> How everybody feels about it? > >>>> > >> > >> I think this makes a lot of sense, thanks for suggesting it. > >> > >> Should this be a BoF or just a normal topic proposal? I assume that there > >> could be several different topics of interest all related to CXL.mem. > >> > > > > +1 for a normal topic proposal. > > By the way, Samsung SMDK (memory development kit) suggested memory model > in user-space and kernel memory subsystem modification. I assume that we need > to discuss the memory model and kernel-space modification. So, it could be one of > the CXL related topic. Could we expect that Samsung guys deliver a talk? +Kyungsan Kim It is my understanding that Kyungsan, who is the lead for the SMDK project is interested in sharing with the community some lessons learned from working with CXL attached memory and a CFP is planned. > > Thanks, > Slava. >
