On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 04:47:43PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 04.04.19 15:25, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 03:18:00PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> >>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> >>> index f206b8b66af1..d8a3e9554aec 100644
> >>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> >>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> >>> @@ -1451,15 +1451,11 @@ static int
> >>> offline_isolated_pages_cb(unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages,
> >>> void *data)
> >>> {
> >>> - __offline_isolated_pages(start, start + nr_pages);
> >>> - return 0;
> >>> -}
> >>> + unsigned long offlined_pages;
> >>>
> >>> -static void
> >>> -offline_isolated_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
> >>> -{
> >>> - walk_system_ram_range(start_pfn, end_pfn - start_pfn, NULL,
> >>> - offline_isolated_pages_cb);
> >>> + offlined_pages = __offline_isolated_pages(start, start + nr_pages);
> >>> + *(unsigned long *)data += offlined_pages;
> >>
> >> unsigned long *offlined_pages = data;
> >>
> >> *offlined_pages += __offline_isolated_pages(start, start + nr_pages);
> >
> > Yeah, more readable.
> >
> >> Only nits
> >
> > About the identation, I double checked the code and it looks fine to me.
> > In [1] looks fine too, might be your mail client?
> >
> > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10885571/
>
> Double checked, alignment on the parameter on the new line is very weird.
Uhm, are not you confused because we removed the "while (off...)", and
"ret =" gets idented right below "/*check again*".
Try to apply the patch and check whether you still see the issue.
I just checked out the branch and it looks fine to me.
> And both lines cross 80 lines per line ... nit :)
Yeah, 81 characters, but I decided to go with that rather than start doing
tricky things to accomplish 80 characters.
Maybe Andrew agrees, or he might slap me.
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
