On 04.04.19 15:25, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 04, 2019 at 03:18:00PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> index f206b8b66af1..d8a3e9554aec 100644
>>> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
>>> @@ -1451,15 +1451,11 @@ static int
>>> offline_isolated_pages_cb(unsigned long start, unsigned long nr_pages,
>>> void *data)
>>> {
>>> - __offline_isolated_pages(start, start + nr_pages);
>>> - return 0;
>>> -}
>>> + unsigned long offlined_pages;
>>>
>>> -static void
>>> -offline_isolated_pages(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
>>> -{
>>> - walk_system_ram_range(start_pfn, end_pfn - start_pfn, NULL,
>>> - offline_isolated_pages_cb);
>>> + offlined_pages = __offline_isolated_pages(start, start + nr_pages);
>>> + *(unsigned long *)data += offlined_pages;
>>
>> unsigned long *offlined_pages = data;
>>
>> *offlined_pages += __offline_isolated_pages(start, start + nr_pages);
>
> Yeah, more readable.
>
>> Only nits
>
> About the identation, I double checked the code and it looks fine to me.
> In [1] looks fine too, might be your mail client?
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10885571/
Double checked, alignment on the parameter on the new line is very weird.
And both lines cross 80 lines per line ... nit :)
>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Thanks ;-)
>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
