On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > So I'm not convinced that it's true in this case. >> > >> > Could we see the C version and compare? I could be wrong about it all. >> >> Here it is (without instrumentation): >> https://gist.github.com/dvyukov/e33d580f701019e0cd99429054ff1f9a > > Could you please include the full patch so that it can be discussed via email and > such? Mailed the whole series. >> Instrumentation will add for each function: >> >> static __always_inline void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, long long i) >> { >> + kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v)); >> arch_atomic64_set(v, i); >> } > > That in itself looks sensible and readable. > > Thanks, > > Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
