* Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So I'm not convinced that it's true in this case. > > > > Could we see the C version and compare? I could be wrong about it all. > > Here it is (without instrumentation): > https://gist.github.com/dvyukov/e33d580f701019e0cd99429054ff1f9a Could you please include the full patch so that it can be discussed via email and such? > Instrumentation will add for each function: > > static __always_inline void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, long long i) > { > + kasan_check_write(v, sizeof(*v)); > arch_atomic64_set(v, i); > } That in itself looks sensible and readable. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
