* Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Are just utterly disgusting that turn perfectly readable code into an > > unreadable, unmaintainable mess. > > > > You need to find some better, cleaner solution please, or convince me that no > > such solution is possible. NAK for the time being. > > Well, I can just write all functions as is. Does it better confirm to kernel > style? I think writing the prototypes out as-is, properly organized, beats any of these macro based solutions. > [...] I've just looked at the x86 atomic.h and it uses macros for similar > purpose (ATOMIC_OP/ATOMIC_FETCH_OP), so I thought that must be idiomatic kernel > style... Mind fixing those too while at it? And please squash any bug fixes and re-send a clean series against latest upstream or so. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxx. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>
