Re: [S+Q 00/16] SLUB with Queueing beats SLAB in hackbench

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, David Rientjes wrote:

In addition to that benchmark, which regresses on systems with larger
numbers of cpus, you had posted results for slub vs slab for kernbench,
aim9, and sysbench before slub was ever merged.  If you're going to use
slab-like queueing in slub, it would be interesting to see if these
particular benchmarks regress once again.

I do not have access to Itanium systems anymore. I hope Mike can run some
benchmarks?


Sure, but I won't have a lot of time as we're pushing out the first
customer UV systems and that's keeping me pretty busy.

If it's all packaged up and ready to run that would help a lot.

Thanks,
Mike

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]