On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, Pekka Enberg wrote: >> > Hackbench I don't think is that interesting. SLQB was beating SLAB >> > too. >> >> We've seen regressions pop up with hackbench so I think it's >> interesting. Not the most interesting one, for sure, nor conclusive. On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hackbench was frequently cited in performance tests. Which benchmarks > would be of interest? I am off this week so dont expect a fast response > from me. I guess "netperf TCP_RR" is the most interesting one because that's a known benchmark where SLUB performs poorly when compared to SLAB. Mel's extensive slab benchmarks are also worth looking at: http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0902.0/00745.html -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href