Re: [S+Q 00/16] SLUB with Queueing beats SLAB in hackbench

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, David Rientjes wrote:

> In addition to that benchmark, which regresses on systems with larger
> numbers of cpus, you had posted results for slub vs slab for kernbench,
> aim9, and sysbench before slub was ever merged.  If you're going to use
> slab-like queueing in slub, it would be interesting to see if these
> particular benchmarks regress once again.

I do not have access to Itanium systems anymore. I hope Mike can run some
benchmarks?

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]