Re: why are some low-level MM routines being exported?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 09:36:00AM +0900, Minchan Kim (minchan.kim@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> > All filesystems already call it through find_or_create_page() or
> > grab_page() invoked via read path. In some cases fs has more than
> > one page grabbed via its internal path where data to be read is
> > already placed, so it may want just to add those pages into mm lru.
> 
> I understood why it does need that in pohmelfs.
> AFAIU, other file system using general functions(ex, mpage_readpages or
> read_cache_pages) don't need direct LRU handling since it's hided.
> But pohmelfs doesn't use general functions.
> 
> Isn't pagevec_lru_add_file enough like other file system(ex, nfs, cifs)?

This will force to reinvent add_to_page_cache_lru() by doing private
function which will call add_to_page_cache() and pagevec_lru_add_file(),
which is effectively what is being done for file backed pages in
add_to_page_cache_lru().

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxx  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@xxxxxxxxx";> email@xxxxxxxxx </a>

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]