On Mon, 2016-01-25 at 00:48 +0000, Andy Furniss wrote: > Russel Winder wrote: > > On Sun, 2016-01-24 at 10:07 +0000, Andy Furniss wrote: > > > It finds all the physical channels, quite happily describes all the > > virtual channels in the T1 channels, fails to find anything in one > > of the T2 channels and finds unnamed channels in the other T2 > > channel. The device itself is fine, as it gets all T1 and T2 > > channels > > on Windows. This implies something awry with it in a Linux context. > > OK, I can't reproduce this on Tacoleneston which has three T2 muxes. I have managed to get some proper T2 tuning. :-) Someone emailed me privately to tell me about: https://github.com/OpenELEC/dvb-firmware The 292e demod firmware in their is 8 bug fix release further on that the one I had. It looks like there was a crucial bug fix in there. > I am using some old git version (Jun 10), I'll try current as time > allows. > > One of the T2s only has 2 channels anyway and as is normal AFAIK > channels that aren't running at time of scan don't get audio/video > pids > listed, but the rest of the info is there. > > There is a timeout option eg -T 3 trebles the timeouts - maybe try > that. I had tried -T 2 but that didn't do any good. I suspect the firmware I had just wasn't up to it, but the new one was. > > > The whole point of my activity is to rewrite Me TV. This is > > intended > > as a very lightweight DVB player. The idea is not to have MythTV, > > Kodi, etc. which are intended to be media centres. I just want a > > television window with EPG. Original Me TV was GTK+2, Xine, DVBv3 > > with direct access to the kernel API. I am rewriting for libdvbv5, > > GStreamer, GTK+3. > > > > I am starting with scan and tune codes so as to set up dvr0 as the > > input source for the rendering. dvbv5-zap -p is an experimental > > tool > > to plug into a gst-launcher-1.0 script just to trial things. My > > code > > has the same problems dvbv5-zap has, describing my problem in terms > > of dvbv5-zap behaviour just means it isn't my code that is wrong, > > there is an issue somewhere in the libdvbv5 code or the device > > driver. > > Interesting, so you know a lot more than me about this stuff :-) I doubt that, but I am learning a lot very quickly! I think having D, Rust, Python, and C++ bindings to libdvbv5 would help tremendously getting it traction. Writing stuff in C with all the 1970s programming paradigms is a real turn off in 2010s. > Experience as a user of 292/290s - they do need some time/grace to > tune > in/stop spewing "junk". IIRC I added 5sec somewhere in TVH in > addition > to whatever it already uses. > > I guess going from T to T2 is worse - and then factor in that some > T2s > are much lower power than others. I am finding locking behaviour to be very strange. Sometimes I get an immediate lock on a -50.0 signal, sometimes -35.0 signal fails to lock. I am not sure if this is just a timing/sampling thing or whether there is a quality of signal thing I am missing. As I am focused on lightweight, I am working with non-fixed aerials so low signal strengths. Though for testing I have an aerial with powered high gain. > It did seem in the thread that I started where EAGAIN worked around, > that the code was giving no grace at all and expecting to be able to > parse stream content straight away. I may mis-remember though! -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.winder@xxxxxxxxx 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: russel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part