On Mar 11, 2011, at 6:35 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote: > On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:30 PM, <jean.bruenn@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Doesn't seem weird to me at all. This is a pretty uncommon card, so >>> it is entirely possible that many revisions could go by without >>> someone noticing a regression. I know for example that the HVR-1500Q >>> (the US version of that board) was broken for months and nobody >>> noticed. >> >> Well. How was it solved at the hvr-1500q? :) Any other information i >> could provide maybe? > > It's not clear to me that it ever was resolved for the 1500q. If the > goal is for it to get fixed, it's usually a matter of getting a sample > unit in the hands of a developer who knows how to debug the issue. A > common problem is the lack of overlap between people who have the > board versus people who know what to do with it. The HVR-1500Q I've got works fine with the latest media_tree code, but admittedly, it sits unused most of the time, so it had been several months since I last tried it before about a week ago... (Got it for my thinkpad, planning to just leave it plugged in all the time, until finding out it stuck out a good inch from the side of the machine). -- Jarod Wilson jarod@xxxxxxxxxxxx -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
