On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 6:30 PM, <jean.bruenn@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Doesn't seem weird to me at all. This is a pretty uncommon card, so >> it is entirely possible that many revisions could go by without >> someone noticing a regression. I know for example that the HVR-1500Q >> (the US version of that board) was broken for months and nobody >> noticed. > > Well. How was it solved at the hvr-1500q? :) Any other information i > could provide maybe? It's not clear to me that it ever was resolved for the 1500q. If the goal is for it to get fixed, it's usually a matter of getting a sample unit in the hands of a developer who knows how to debug the issue. A common problem is the lack of overlap between people who have the board versus people who know what to do with it. Devin -- Devin J. Heitmueller - Kernel Labs http://www.kernellabs.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
