Hello Marvin, On Thu, May 19, 2022 at 01:39:01PM +0800, Kun-Fa Lin wrote: [...] > In this architecture, for the case of WPCM450 (though it's in EOL for > several years), I'd prefer to try to let ECE be an optional node > instead of separating ECE code from this V4L2 video driver. However, > this patch series could be the base version and keep reviewing, and > afterwards we could make another patch for optional ECE, is it OK for > you? That's OK for me. I will wait until the driver is ready and merged, and then start working on WPCM450 integration and making ECE optional. Regarding WPCM450 being EOL, I'm aware, and I don't want to hold up your team's work on newer SoCs. But I personally find this old SoC interesting and I want to share driver code with newer SoCs where possible. Thank you, Jonathan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
