On Sunday 30 May 2010 09:07:46 VDR User wrote: > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Mike Booth <mike_booth76@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > i think someone is too concerned about being precisely accurate. So much so > > that no-one can see the woods for the trees any more. > > > > Its not important to me that accuracy is spot on. I only want to know that > > when tuning the dish I'm getting \better or worse. > > I tend to agree with this. Ultimately what's important is not > necessarily that the readings are 100% accurate, but rather simply put > into some kind of universal scale that provides useful output to the > user. Many users were happy to see some activity addressing this > issue and unfortunately it seems to have stalled out but I'm not sure > why. I honestly felt there was enough common ground being discussed > that we'd have a solution by now. To the best of my knowledge Mike Krufky intended to work on this but he clearly no longer has time to do that work. Mike, can you perhaps explain what you wanted to do? Hopefully someone else can find the time to implement it. Regards, Hans -- Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG, part of Cisco -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
