On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Mike Booth <mike_booth76@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > i think someone is too concerned about being precisely accurate. So much so > that no-one can see the woods for the trees any more. > > Its not important to me that accuracy is spot on. I only want to know that > when tuning the dish I'm getting \better or worse. I tend to agree with this. Ultimately what's important is not necessarily that the readings are 100% accurate, but rather simply put into some kind of universal scale that provides useful output to the user. Many users were happy to see some activity addressing this issue and unfortunately it seems to have stalled out but I'm not sure why. I honestly felt there was enough common ground being discussed that we'd have a solution by now. Regards. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
