On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:26 AM, Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Question: shouldn't we merge dvb-apps and v4l-utils? The alevtv tool was > merged into dvb-apps, but while that tool supports dvb, it also supports > v4l2. Just like we merged dvb and v4l in a single repository, so I think we > should also merge the tools to a media-utils repository. Alevt was never maintained. One of the guys who sent a patch wanted a place to hold his patch and hence it is there. If you have a better place to put it up, please do let me know. It's place is not in the dvb-apps tree. It has other dependencies, hence the build for it is disabled by default. > It remains a fact of life that dvb and v4l are connected and trying to > artificially keep them apart does not make much sense to me. In fact, I don't see anything that's what is common in the digital and analog applications. Other than that, I don't see a single line of code from you, in dvb-apps to make such assertive statements. Regards, Manu -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
