Hello, On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 14:44 +0100, Oliver Endriss wrote: > > This more clear for debugging > > (hardware and software ). > > This problem is reported by one of our customer. Your changeset > > 13673:75331e740f61 is broke 22khz tone functionality on our cards. > Ok, I did not expect that someone would set LNBH24_TEN in > override_clear. ;-) yes, this not trivial to trace all "override" definitions :) > > We need to find compromise. Reverting the patch is not a problem ( in > > this case we need to remove override_clear=LNBH24_TEN). > > No problem. Both solutions above are ok for me. Maybe b) is more robust, > because it allows override_clear=LNBH24_TEN to be used. > I leaveit to you: Choose the one you like. ok. second is choosen - it's no broke yours and our logic. -- Abylai Ospan <aospan@xxxxxxxx> NetUP Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
