On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote: > On Wednesday 02 December 2009 04:55:00 Andy Walls wrote: > > On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 15:59 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I would like to start a discussion which ideally results in either > > > changing the SCM of v4l-dvb to git _or_ leaving everything as it is today > > > with mercurial. > > > > > > > > > I'm waiting for comments. > > > > I only have one requirement: reduce bandwidth usage between the server > > and my home. > > > > The less I have to clone out 65 M of history to start a new series of > > patches the better. I suppose that would include a rebase... > > Unfortunately, one reason for moving to git would be to finally be able to > make changes to the arch directory tree. The fact that that part is > unavailable in v4l-dvb is a big problem when working with SoCs. And these will > become much more important in the near future. FWIW, tomorrow (or a day or two later) I'll have to spend time again back-porting arch changes from git to hg, to be able to push my current patches... Thanks Guennadi --- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. Freelance Open-Source Software Developer http://www.open-technology.de/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
