Re: Replace Mercurial with GIT as SCM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday 02 December 2009 04:55:00 Andy Walls wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 15:59 +0100, Patrick Boettcher wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I would like to start a discussion which ideally results in either
> > changing the SCM of v4l-dvb to git _or_ leaving everything as it is today
> > with mercurial.
> >
> >
> > I'm waiting for comments.
>
> I only have one requirement: reduce bandwidth usage between the server
> and my home.
>
> The less I have to clone out 65 M of history to start a new series of
> patches the better.  I suppose that would include a rebase...

Unfortunately, one reason for moving to git would be to finally be able to 
make changes to the arch directory tree. The fact that that part is 
unavailable in v4l-dvb is a big problem when working with SoCs. And these will 
become much more important in the near future.

Regards,

	Hans

>
> Regards,
> Andy
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Input]     [Video for Linux]     [Gstreamer Embedded]     [Mplayer Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux