Hi Sam, Mingye, On 4/5/23 03:53, Sam James wrote: > > Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] >> Hi Mingye, >> >> On 4/3/23 18:24, Mingye Wang wrote: >>> Hi Alex, >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 5:56 AM Alejandro Colomar wrote: >>>> If it's just a reference to the software, that is fine. If it's a >>>> reference to the version, then I want it to be greppable. >>>> >>> >>> Is my patch attached to the last message all good, or is there >>> anything more to do? >> >> Sorry about the delay; I'm a bit overloaded. Did you check Sam's >> objection? > > I'm happy now after a clarification was made (libssp does more than I thought > it did). Thanks! I applied the patch, with Acked-by: Sam James <sam@xxxxxxxxxx>. Cheers, Alex > >> >> On 3/23/23 06:38, Sam James wrote: >>> The patch looks OK to me in terms of the content, apart from the libssp >>> mention. libssp and stack smashing protection overall is distinct from >>> fortification. >>> >>> SSP is where stack canaries are emitted and their value is checked >>> later on to see if they're intact. Fortification is where certain >>> functions are replaced with variants that check the size of their >>> arguments e.g. dst & src and ensure they're big enough. They're distinct. >> >> Thanks, >> Alex >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Mingye > -- <http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> GPG key fingerprint: A9348594CE31283A826FBDD8D57633D441E25BB5
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature