Alejandro Colomar <alx.manpages@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > Hi Mingye, > > On 4/3/23 18:24, Mingye Wang wrote: >> Hi Alex, >> >> On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 5:56 AM Alejandro Colomar wrote: >>> If it's just a reference to the software, that is fine. If it's a >>> reference to the version, then I want it to be greppable. >>> >> >> Is my patch attached to the last message all good, or is there >> anything more to do? > > Sorry about the delay; I'm a bit overloaded. Did you check Sam's > objection? I'm happy now after a clarification was made (libssp does more than I thought it did). > > On 3/23/23 06:38, Sam James wrote: >> The patch looks OK to me in terms of the content, apart from the libssp >> mention. libssp and stack smashing protection overall is distinct from >> fortification. >> >> SSP is where stack canaries are emitted and their value is checked >> later on to see if they're intact. Fortification is where certain >> functions are replaced with variants that check the size of their >> arguments e.g. dst & src and ensure they're big enough. They're distinct. > > Thanks, > Alex > >> >> Thanks, >> Mingye
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
