Hi Mingye, On 4/3/23 18:24, Mingye Wang wrote: > Hi Alex, > > On Sat, Apr 1, 2023 at 5:56 AM Alejandro Colomar wrote: >> If it's just a reference to the software, that is fine. If it's a >> reference to the version, then I want it to be greppable. >> > > Is my patch attached to the last message all good, or is there > anything more to do? Sorry about the delay; I'm a bit overloaded. Did you check Sam's objection? On 3/23/23 06:38, Sam James wrote: > The patch looks OK to me in terms of the content, apart from the libssp > mention. libssp and stack smashing protection overall is distinct from > fortification. > > SSP is where stack canaries are emitted and their value is checked > later on to see if they're intact. Fortification is where certain > functions are replaced with variants that check the size of their > arguments e.g. dst & src and ensure they're big enough. They're distinct. Thanks, Alex > > Thanks, > Mingye -- <http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> GPG key fingerprint: A9348594CE31283A826FBDD8D57633D441E25BB5
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
