On 24/08/2022 17:02, Jakub Wilk wrote: > The latest bpf-helpers(7) man page update introduced a few misspellings: > >> -EFAULT on failrue to parse the existing header options. > > failrue -> failure > >> this helper enforces the key must be an task_struct > > an -> a > >> Returns the stored IMA hash of the inode (if it's avaialable) > > avaialable -> available > >> Providing an len_diff adjustment that is larger than the actual packet >> size (resulting in negative packet size) will in principle not exceed >> the MTU, why it is not considered a failure. > > an -> a > > But I can't parse the subordinate clause. I think it should be: > > ..., which is why it is not considered a failure. > >> Other BPF-helpers are needed for performing the planned size change, >> why the responsability for catch a negative packet size belong in >> those helpers. > > I can't parse this subordinate clause either. I guess it was meant to say: > > ..., which is why the responsibility for catching a negative packet size > belongs in those helpers. > > Any volunteers to fix the misspellings on the kernel side? > I'll have a look at these and send a fix. It's likely that some of those are my mistakes anyway. Thanks for the report, Quentin
