The latest bpf-helpers(7) man page update introduced a few misspellings:
-EFAULT on failrue to parse the existing header options.
failrue -> failure
this helper enforces the key must be an task_struct
an -> a
Returns the stored IMA hash of the inode (if it's avaialable)
avaialable -> available
Providing an len_diff adjustment that is larger than the actual packet
size (resulting in negative packet size) will in principle not exceed
the MTU, why it is not considered a failure.
an -> a
But I can't parse the subordinate clause. I think it should be:
..., which is why it is not considered a failure.
Other BPF-helpers are needed for performing the planned size change,
why the responsability for catch a negative packet size belong in those
helpers.
I can't parse this subordinate clause either. I guess it was meant to say:
..., which is why the responsibility for catching a negative packet size
belongs in those helpers.
Any volunteers to fix the misspellings on the kernel side?
--
Jakub Wilk
