Re: [patch] packet.7: PACKET_LOSS has inverse meaning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [patch] packet.7: PACKET_LOSS has inverse meaning
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 12:45:54 +0200
Cc: Carsten Andrich <carsten.andrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-man@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@xxxxxxxxx>, Neil Horman <nhorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <5358E59E.2000207@gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0

On 04/24/2014 12:21 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
...

I'd leave that plan largely to you. It sounds like Willem and
Daniel are willing to help out.


Feel free to keep us in Cc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-man" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- [patch] packet.7: PACKET_LOSS has inverse meaning
  - From: Carsten Andrich
- Re: [patch] packet.7: PACKET_LOSS has inverse meaning
  - From: Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
- Re: [patch] packet.7: PACKET_LOSS has inverse meaning
  - From: Willem de Bruijn
- Re: [patch] packet.7: PACKET_LOSS has inverse meaning
  - From: Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
- Re: [patch] packet.7: PACKET_LOSS has inverse meaning
  - From: Willem de Bruijn
- Re: [patch] packet.7: PACKET_LOSS has inverse meaning
  - From: Carsten Andrich
- Re: [patch] packet.7: PACKET_LOSS has inverse meaning
  - From: Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
- Re: [patch] packet.7: PACKET_LOSS has inverse meaning
  - From: Carsten Andrich
- Re: [patch] packet.7: PACKET_LOSS has inverse meaning
  - From: Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
- Re: [patch] packet.7: PACKET_LOSS has inverse meaning
  - From: Carsten Andrich
- Re: [patch] packet.7: PACKET_LOSS has inverse meaning
  - From: Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
- Re: [patch] packet.7: PACKET_LOSS has inverse meaning
  - From: Carsten Andrich
- Re: [patch] packet.7: PACKET_LOSS has inverse meaning
  - From: Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] packet.7: PACKET_LOSS has inverse meaning
Next by Date: Re: [patch] packet.7: PACKET_LOSS has inverse meaning
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] packet.7: PACKET_LOSS has inverse meaning
Next by thread: Re: [patch] packet.7: PACKET_LOSS has inverse meaning
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Documentation] [Netdev] [Linux Ethernet Bridging] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba]