On 10/17/2016 01:43 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote: >>>> See above. At the moment _any_ test result from your side would do. >>> >>> I imagine that another single result might not be representative. >> >> Publish not only results but also everything (complete!) so that anyone >> can *easily* follow it to check and reproduce the results - especially >> if you want people with knowledge of other architectures to comment >> (otherwise they probably won't bother). > > Am I the only software developer so far who would dare to reconsider > implementation details from three status functions? > No. But we're waiting for you showing is that it is an improvement. Which at the moment we don't see. Hence we're waiting from a proof or validation from your side. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
