Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/16/2016 07:10 PM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>> Does it improve code? Does it improve anything?
> 
> Yes. - I got such an impression.
> 
> * Is it more efficient to call the function "seq_printf" for the desired data processing
>   for a single character than to pass it to the function "" in a string?
> 
> * Will the required data transfer shrink a bit for the affected functions because of
>   such a change?
> 
Which are questions _you_ should be able to answer.
It's your patch, after all.
Once you do (and prove that the answer is 'yes' to the above two
questions) the patch will be applied.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		   Teamlead Storage & Networking
hare@xxxxxxx			               +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux