Re: MD-RAID: Use seq_putc() in three status functions?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Does it improve code? Does it improve anything?

Yes. - I got such an impression.

* Is it more efficient to call the function "seq_printf" for the desired data processing
  for a single character than to pass it to the function "" in a string?

* Will the required data transfer shrink a bit for the affected functions because of
  such a change?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux