Re: [PATCH 01/10] dm snapshot: Use kmalloc_array() in init_origin_hash()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 13:56 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> It doesn't matter match either way to me.
> 
> The case for the unnecessary multiply with <= gcc 4.8 was
> removed with:
> 
> commit 91c6a05f72a996bee5133e76374ab3ad7d3b9b72
> Author: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date:   Tue Jul 26 15:22:08 2016 -0700
> 
>     mm: faster kmalloc_array(), kcalloc()
>     
>     When both arguments to kmalloc_array() or kcalloc() are known at compile
>     time then their product is known at compile time but search for kmalloc
>     cache happens at runtime not at compile time.
>     
>     Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160627213454.GA2440@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>     Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx>
>     Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxx>
>     Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
>     Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@xxxxxxx>
>     Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>     Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

You've lost me.

Why does this stop you fixing an apparently wrong checkpatch rule,
crude as parts of it are (ie, uppercase identifier must be a constant)?


Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux