Re: mfd: smsc-ece1099: Fine-tuning for smsc_i2c_probe()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 12 Jan 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:

> > In my inbox, your set looks like this:
> 
> Thanks for your information. - I find the display correct.
> 
> > ... which is unconventional and pretty confusing.
> 
> Do you request that I should resend my four update suggestions
> for different components as a single patch series for the software
> area "drivers/mfd"?

You have to make that decision yourself.  What I'm saying is, if the
cover letter says there are 2 patches in the set, that's what we
should expect.

> > I fear you are sending these patches manually, using your mail client.
> 
> I admit that I am doing this usually.

Please don't do that.

> > You should instead be creating patches with `git format-patch`
> 
> This happens also …
> 
> > and sending them using `git send-email`.
> 
> I prefer other software tools for this task so far.

Such as?

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux