Re: [PATCH 0/2] mfd: smsc-ece1099: Fine-tuning for smsc_i2c_probe()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> This set is confusing.
> 
> Why do you have a cover letter specifying this as a 2 patch set,
> yet there are 4 patches attached to it?

I do not see too many messages for this update suggestion.


>> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 15:10:48 +0100
> 
> What format is this?

Are such specifications needed to preserve the desired authorship information
during the transfer of commit messages by email?

Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux