Re: [PATCH 0/2] mfd: smsc-ece1099: Fine-tuning for smsc_i2c_probe()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This set is confusing.

Why do you have a cover letter specifying this as a 2 patch set, yet
there are 4 patches attached to it?

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2015 15:10:48 +0100

What format is this?

> A few update suggestions were taken into account
> from static source code analysis.
> 
> Markus Elfring (2):
>   Delete an unnecessary variable initialisation
>   Refactoring
> 
>  drivers/mfd/smsc-ece1099.c | 11 ++++-------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux