Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: smsc-ece1099: Refactoring for smsc_i2c_probe()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please refrain from replying off-list.  Adding back the Cc's.

On Tue, 12 Jan 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > Oh, the subject line is also duff.  Please describe the changes properly.
> > 
> > "refactoring X", "making changes to Y" are not good subject lines.
> 
> Which topic would you prefer for my update suggestion instead?

This one.

"mfd: smsc-ece1099: Refactoring for smsc_i2c_probe()"

The function name and just describing the changes as "refactoring" do
not describe the changes in a helpful way.

> >> Code looks fine however.
> 
> Thanks for your look.
> 
> 
> >> Please re-submit the set with the aforementioned changes along with my:
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Do you really request that I should append this tag already to messages
> for (my adjusted) commits you can not see so far?

Yes.  The code looks fine, and if the commit log is still not up to
scratch I just won't apply it. :)

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux