Re: [patch] x86/efi: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 10 Mar, at 07:27:50AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> 
> Is it such a bad thing to be prepared for this sort of machine to
> arrive even if likely there are none so far?

I think it's a bad thing for us to carry code in the kernel that has no
users, yes.

If someone wants it in the future, they can pull it out of git.

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux