Re: [patch] x86/efi: use GFP_ATOMIC under spin_lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 04:20:20PM +0000, Matt Fleming wrote:

> We have tried to use the time functions before, with little success
> because of various bugs in the runtime implementations, e.g. see commit
> bacef661acdb ("x86-64/efi: Use EFI to deal with platform wall clock")
> and commit bd52276fa1d4 ("x86-64/efi: Use EFI to deal with platform wall
> clock (again)").

I'd naively expected that these would be more reliable after the 1:1 
mapping patches, so it might actually be time to give them another go.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Announce]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Networking Development]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux