On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 2:26 AM Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 9:08 AM Linus Torvalds > <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > So here's the simple rule: if the packaging people can't be bothered > > to use "gti archive" to make their packages, then they had better just > > do a "make clean" first (or, better yet, do "git clean -dqfx" to > > really clean up, because "make clean" isn't 100% reliable either). > > > > We don't add more broken infrastructure to deal with broken workflows. > > Just do the right thing. > > Note: I'm perfectly happy to just revert this, but if I have to do it, > then pretty much _all_ the packaging changes get reverted, because I'm > not going to be able to figure out which parts don't rely on the new > broken script. > > So I'd rather take a more directed revert from you. Or, better yet, > just a rewrite to do the right thing (ie "git archive"). > > Because really - any distro packager had better have the git tree. OK, let's go this way. Please give me a few days. > > Linus -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
