On 2.11.2011 10:17, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 2.11.2011 09:41, Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> Yeah. Note that it's more like an 'add' operation, not a modify >>> operation, thus: >>> >>> make addconfig=kvm >>> >>> or: >>> >>> make addconfig kvm >>> >>> would be intuitive and would work well too. >>> >>> Sam, Michal, which one would you prefer? The latter might have the >>> advantage that it's additive, enabling future usages like: >>> >>> make addconfig kvm debug >> >> The problem is that neither of these fit into the make command syntax: >> >> make addconfig kvm debug >> >> tells make to build three different targets, and >> >> make addconfig=kvm >> >> tells make to create a variable named addconfig with the value kvm >> and build the default target. And BTW, you or someone else >> reassured me earlier in the thread that this is going to be needed >> for the kvm case solely, so why are you inventing something generic >> now? :) > > Because we are trying to find *something* that is both usable and > which you guys are willing to ack. > > So what's your suggestion? Is 'make kvmconfig' OK? As I said, make kvmconfig is fine with me, if it's just this single case. Michal -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
