* Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On 2.11.2011 10:17, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Michal Marek <mmarek@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 2.11.2011 09:41, Ingo Molnar wrote: > >>> Yeah. Note that it's more like an 'add' operation, not a modify > >>> operation, thus: > >>> > >>> make addconfig=kvm > >>> > >>> or: > >>> > >>> make addconfig kvm > >>> > >>> would be intuitive and would work well too. > >>> > >>> Sam, Michal, which one would you prefer? The latter might have the > >>> advantage that it's additive, enabling future usages like: > >>> > >>> make addconfig kvm debug > >> > >> The problem is that neither of these fit into the make command syntax: > >> > >> make addconfig kvm debug > >> > >> tells make to build three different targets, and > >> > >> make addconfig=kvm > >> > >> tells make to create a variable named addconfig with the value kvm > >> and build the default target. And BTW, you or someone else > >> reassured me earlier in the thread that this is going to be needed > >> for the kvm case solely, so why are you inventing something generic > >> now? :) > > > > Because we are trying to find *something* that is both usable and > > which you guys are willing to ack. > > > > So what's your suggestion? Is 'make kvmconfig' OK? > > As I said, make kvmconfig is fine with me, if it's just this single case. > > Michal Great, thanks! Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kbuild" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
