On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 05:10:41PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2019-11-04 11:27:32 [-0700], Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > On Mon Nov 04 19, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > On 2019-11-04 10:37:09 [-0700], Jerry Snitselaar wrote:
> > > > It looks like checkpatch is expecting the word commit to precede the hash on the same line.
> > > > I get no errors with the following:
> > >
> > > That would explain it. That is however not what the TIP tree and other
> > > people do not to mention that reading wise it makes sense to keep the
> > > word `commit' as part of the sentence and add the hash in the next line.
> > >
> >
> > Yes it reads better. What about the following?
> >
> > Added in commit 9e1b74a63f776 ("tpm: add support for nonblocking
> > operation"), but never actually used it.
> >
> > And then add the Fixes: line above the Cc: and Signed-off-by: ?
>
> Can please get over with? It is a simple patch. It has simple
> description.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20191028202419.GA7214@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
I'm also cool with cc stable as long as the commit is message has the
correct format.
/Jarkko
