2010/11/10 Harald Hoyer <harald@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 11/08/2010 08:03 PM, Jon Ander Hernandez wrote: >> >> 2010/11/8 Seewer Philippe<philippe.seewer@xxxxxx>: >> >>> I just had a quick look over the patch and in itself it looks ok. >>> Although >>> I'm not sure if having the aufs at this stage is necessary. What if you >>> just >>> mount it later inside the rootfs? (Background: I'm using aufs overlays >>> for >>> our read only nfs-roots, and I just put the necessary aufs mounts inside >>> fstab) >> >> I have to say that I haven't thought about it before.... It is really >> a good idea, and is probably better than have a specific module. :-) >> >> But something that worries me, is if the init process will cause >> problems, since we will be mounting a new root over the old one once >> we have processes which have previously opened files on the old /. >> >> Regards, >> >> Jon Ander. > > So, do you still need this dracut module? Or is it good enough, to do this > in the real root? The short answer is I still require something which makes the union mount very early. The long answer is I don't know if it is feasible to do the union mount on the fstab or if the initramfs is the only option. The idea doesn't seem to be so bad, but I find terrible dificul to debug the result when in that ecuation you have nfs4 and upstart. So I don't exactly know what is going on before my nodes get freezed... I'll need to make more tests, and debug a little more. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
