Hello, We are currently developing a tool for creating simple beowulf clusters, and we decided to use Dracut instead of initramfs-tools on Debian. We found Dracut to be very well designed. We have developed a very simple module, which allows us to have a writable overlay over a read-only exported nfs4 using aufs : http://kestrelhpc.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/kestrelhpc/Kestrelhpc/Src/dracut/union_mount_with_aufs.diff Well, it is so general that also allows to get a writable overlay over any root mounted by Dracut. I've seen that you are changing Dracut's parameter's namespace, and I would like to know if this kind of "live" use case could fit in them somehow, because it seems that the actual live namespace implies the classic live cd-rom use case. We also have several patches for make Dracut 007's network work on Ubuntu Maverick. Should I open a bug on Debian's bugzilla or should they be reviewed on this list instead? Cheers, Jon Ander -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
