On 07/03/2009 02:04 AM, Victor Lowther wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 16:10 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 07/02/2009 03:20 PM, Seewer Philippe wrote:
Why not just put cryptsetup back into mountscripts as I've suggested
before?
Because so much more can be inside the crypto partition, which might
need further processing.
That is correct. But if it's in mountscripts, it would fire more
udev-events which are caught again by udevadm settle. I don't see
a problem there.
Hmm, we maybe should think of merging pre-mount and mount.
pre-mount makes no sense, if mounting is done inside udev rules.
I would like to chime in again with the longstanding race condition
inherent in having resume from hibernate and root fs mounting as udev
rules.
Right. Maybe we really should not mount from udev rules, and only generate a
/mount script or set a symlink to /dev/root.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
