On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 16:10 +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote: > On 07/02/2009 03:20 PM, Seewer Philippe wrote: > >>> Why not just put cryptsetup back into mountscripts as I've suggested > >>> before? > >>> > >> > >> Because so much more can be inside the crypto partition, which might > >> need further processing. > > > > That is correct. But if it's in mountscripts, it would fire more > > udev-events which are caught again by udevadm settle. I don't see > > a problem there. > > Hmm, we maybe should think of merging pre-mount and mount. > pre-mount makes no sense, if mounting is done inside udev rules. I would like to chime in again with the longstanding race condition inherent in having resume from hibernate and root fs mounting as udev rules. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- Victor Lowther RHCE# 805008539634727 LPIC-2# LPI000140019 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe initramfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
