On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 19:24:54 +0000
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 20:39:20 +0100
> Antoni Pokusinski <apokusinski01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 11:26:27AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 11:07:10AM +0100, Antoni Pokusinski wrote:
> > > > Applying the current scale value to the raw magnetic field measurements
> > > > gives the result in mT.
> > > >
> > > > Fix the scale by increasing it 10 times, so that the final result after
> > > > applying the scale is in Gauss.
> > >
> > > No objections against this change, just wondering since these are
> > > the ABI changes (correct?) how should we really handle them in case
> > > some of the user space stuff already relies on 'bad' values?
> > >
> > > --
> > > With Best Regards,
> > > Andy Shevchenko
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Just to clarify: yes, this patch makes the output values compliant to
> > ABI (Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-iio). According to the ABI, the
> > output values for the magnetic field should be in Gauss, but during
> > the driver development I missed the fact that I return values in mT
> > instead... (1 Gauss = 0.1mT)
> >
> > BTW I see that the patch cb29542a178f ("iio: magnetometer: si7210: add
> > driver for Si7210") is still on the "testing" branch only, so perhaps
> > it's still not too late to apply the fix?
> >
> Ah. I'd not registered that. Definitely makes life easier.
> This will just get queued up behind it and land upstream at the same
> time.
>
> Jonathan
Applied.
>
> > Kind regards,
> > Antoni
> >
> >
>
>
