On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 5:15 PM Jonathan LoBue <jlobue10@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wednesday, February 14, 2024 1:39:19 AM PST Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 12:39 AM Jonathan LoBue <jlobue10@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > I do not own a device with a bmc150 chip in it, but the same should be > happening in the reverse situation where a device with a bmc150 chip > starts to load the bmi323 driver. There is a chip id check in the > bmi323_init function where a bmc150 device should fail at, and the driver > should release the device. Without a device, I am unable to test that > this works correctly or not. Logically the code looks similar between the > two drivers. But are those IDs different? ... > Depending on Jonathan Cameron's preference about where to put the comment, > and if he wants a v3 or not... If we want to make a v3, should I create a new thread for that? Sure. I also recommend looking at my "smart" script [1] that helps sending kernel related patches. Improvements are welcome as GH pull-requests! [1]: https://github.com/andy-shev/home-bin-tools/blob/master/ge2maintainer.sh -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
