On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 1:48 PM Stephan Gerhold <stephan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 01:29:26PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 12:56 PM Stephan Gerhold <stephan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > The Bosch BMA253 accelerometer is very similar to both BMA254 and BMA255. > > > The current situation is very confusing: BMA254 is supported by the bma180 > > > driver, but BMA255 is supported by the bmc150-accel driver. > > > > > > It turns out the bma180 and bmc150-accel drivers have quite some overlap, > > > and BMA253/BMA254 would be a bit better supported in bmc150 > > > (which has support for the motion trigger/interrupt). > > > > > > This series adds BMA253 support to bmc150-accel and also moves BMA254 > > > over to bmc150, removing some unnecessary code from the bma180 driver. > > > > > > I asked Linus Walleij to test these patches on BMA254 a while ago > > > and he suggested that I already add his Reviewed-by. > > > > I add > > > > > > After addressing comments per patch 1, feel free to add my > > Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> > > to the series. > > > > Thanks for the review! > > I think the re-ordering should be a separate commit to make the diff not > too confusing. Is it fine for you if I send that as a follow-up patch? > I already have two more patches that would conflict with the reordering, > so it would be easier to include that in the next series. > > But I can also re-send the entire series with the extra patch if you > prefer that, just let me know. :) I think that doing the reordering first (if there are no fixes so far) is a good idea. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
