On Thu, 29 Oct 2020 20:10:14 +0100
Lukas Wunner <lukas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 03:50:25PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Oct 2020 21:31:40 +0100 Lukas Wunner <lukas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 06:07:36PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > > +examples:
> > > > + - |
> > > > + spi {
> > > > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > > > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > > > +
> > > > + dac@0 {
> > > > + compatible = "ti,dac082s085";
> > > > + reg = <0>;
> > > > + spi-max-frequency = <40000000>;
> > > > + spi-cpol;
> > > > + spi-cpha;
> > > > + vref-supply = <&vref_2v5_reg>;
> > > > + };
> > > > + };
> > >
> > > Hm, why wasn't the "vref_2v5_reg" node carried over from the txt file?
> >
> > Showing how to supply a regulator isn't generally necessary in an example.
> > I don't mind having it there though so can keep it
> > (as the fixed regulator binding has been converted to yaml)
>
> The "vref_2v5_reg" node is referenced by the "dac@0" node, so I included
> it in the example for completeness. I'd appreciate if it could be carried
> over to the YAML file, unless its inclusion is a bad practice.
Sure. Will do so. Many bindings don't do it, but nor problem with being
more specific.
If we followed the logic of including referenced nodes, some bindings
would end up including nearly a whole board dts. That's not the case
here though so no problem.
Jonathan
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lukas
